WASHINGTON, D.C. — A retired pharma executive is alleging that the COVID-19 shots are part of a military and government-sponsored operation to intentionally harm people all across the world.
Sasha Latypova is a pharmaceutical research and development expert with 25 years of experience working with top drug makers, including Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, AstraZeneca and GSK. She has analyzed the regulatory, organizational, contractual and legal structures of the U.S. COVID-19 response and found irregularities that she says are indications of a plan to harm American citizens and other global populations.
According to Latypova’s research, Pfizer and Moderna avoided major categories of standard safety testing of their COVID-19 products – which constitutes regulatory fraud.
“Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity were assessed only for one component, the chemical SM-102, and only in-vitro cell line experiments. This is completely unacceptable. But the FDA found no problem with this, they completely accepted it – both for Pfizer and Moderna. To me, that says there’s collusion between the regulator and the manufacturer,” Latypova argues.
Other serious concerns that Latypova brings up are variations in the contents of vaccine vials; non-conformance with product labeling; and – remarkably – the presence of foreign and potentially dangerous materials in the solution.
“TOXIC BY DESIGN”
“All these products differ from the labels, but there are some consistent findings,” Latypova says. “For example, the RNA sequence doesn’t conform to the label. We have yet to find a match to what Pfizer says it should be. Then there are huge DNA impurities and protein impurities. There are also consistently other impurities found in large quantities, and they constitute heavy and rare metals that are very toxic to the body.”
According to Latypova, Moderna’s and Pfizer’s mRNA injections break down the immune system, leading to a multitude of catastrophic consequences.
“These products are toxic by design. The numerous mechanisms of injury designed into these products interfere with genetic processes,” she states, adding that such clear and compounded violations of pharmaceutical standards can’t be accidental – but rather, intentional.
“The review of Pfizer and Moderna contracts by which the DoD ordered hundreds of millions of COVID-19 injections revealed lack of real accountability for product safety, efficacy, or manufacturing quality from the pharma manufacturers, combined with a high degree of micromanagement and control from the contracting entity (DOD/BARDA),” Latypova states.
FAR BEYOND PFIZER AND MODERNA
According to Latypova, the public has been misled about the U.S. government’s COVID-19 response. In a detailed presentation, she contends that it is not driven by federal health authorities like the Centers for Disease Control or Department of Health and Human Services – but by the National Security Council and the Department of Defense.
“This is a military program that has suspended all safety rules and regulations everywhere in the world. They are colluding with pharmaceutical manufacturers to drive these deadly products,” Latypova says, referring to the COVID-19 mRNA shots marketed as vaccines.
When the vaccine program was launched under former President Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, the public impression was that the military simply handled the logistics – since that’s what they’re great at doing. It may come as a surprise for many, but the reality is that the DoD was at the helm of the project to inject the nation. DoD served as “Chief Operating Officer” while the Department of Health and Human Services filled the role of “Chief Science Advisor” and the pharmaceutical companies operated as “Project Coordination Teams” for the shots.
However, this may not be so surprising after all when looking back at the history of mRNA technology. In fact, it was the DoD that initiated the research and development of “gene-based therapeutics” – now commonly known as COVID-19 vaccines. The infrastructure for this endeavor was created as far back as in 2012, when the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) launched the ADEPT program. The following year, DARPA invested $25 million in a then-unknown company called Moderna.
“In 2012 with the ADEPT:PROTECT program, DARPA began investing in the development of gene-encoded vaccines, a new category of preventive measures based on DNA or RNA,” the agency acknowledges in a presentation.
Sasha Latypova argues that Pfizer and Moderna are only minor players in the COVID-19 response, which is actually driven by the U.S. military.
“They are not really the vaccine makers, because they didn’t have the required capacity. It would have been impossible for them to fulfill without using the established Defense contracting infrastructure,” Latypova explains.
“COUNTERMEASURES” AND “COVERED PERSONS”
Latypova points out that under the legal framework established for the COVID-19 response, what is colloquially known as COVID-19 vaccines are defined as “countermeasures” in the legal text. As such, they are covered under a declaration by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services dated February 4, 2020, authorized under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.
The declaration states:
“Covered Countermeasures are any antiviral, any other drug, any biologic, any diagnostic, any other device, or any vaccine, used to treat, diagnose, cure, prevent, or mitigate COVID-19, or the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 or a virus mutating therefrom, or any device used in the administration of any such product, and all components and constituent materials of any such product.”
As “countermeasures,” Latypova argues, these products are exempt from normal FDA regulation, testing and approval – since legally, they are not pharmaceuticals. They can unilaterally be granted Emergency Use Authorization by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services based on very loose criteria.
FDA’s involvement with COVID-19 mRNA products is merely “performance art,” Latypova says.
Furthermore, the PREP Act shields most participants involved in the government’s COVID-19 response from any type of liability by extending “covered persons” status to corporations, institutions and individuals – including the United States itself:
“The term ‘Covered Persons’ has a specific meaning and is defined in the PREP Act to include manufacturers, distributors, program planners, and qualified persons, and their officials, agents, and employees, and the United States.”
EVADING PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATIONS
The DoD uses a “nonprofit corporation” called Advanced Technology International, Inc. (ATI) as an intermediary in COVID-19 “countermeasures” procurement. By using this intermediary, normal public procurement and tender regulations can be evaded through a mechanism called Other Transaction Authority (OTA).
ATI is led by Chris Van Metre, a former submarine commander in the U.S. Navy, who is credited with growing the company’s revenue from $150 million to $1.5 billion. ATI’s board of directors is chaired by Joanne Isham, a former deputy director of science and technology with the CIA. According to Isham’s bio, she was instrumental in the creation of In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital firm. Isham also served as deputy director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.
In 2017, ATI was acquired by ANSER (Analytics Services, Inc.) – a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation headquartered in Falls Church, Virginia. On its website, ANSER states that it is “a dynamic, not-for-profit corporation dedicated to public service in the fields of national security, homeland security, and public safety.” Few details about the company are publicly available, except that its leadership and board of directors mainly consist of top national security veterans.
Investigative journalist Whitney Webb has reported that ANSER, along with Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Studies and other think tanks, played a key role in developing the wargame scenario Dark Winter, an exercise held in 2001 that simulated a biological attack on the United States.
Another organization that uses Other Transaction Authority (OTA) as a contracting mechanism is BARDA – an acronym for Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. It was created in 2006 through the passage of the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act. BARDA falls under the Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response and has played a major role during the COVID-19 response. Since its inception, BARDA has doled out a total of $47.5 billion in research and development spending.
Sasha Latypova points out that BARDA has awarded contracts and funding to such a degree that it virtually constitutes a government takeover of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry.
“To put this in perspective, the entire U.S. pharmaceutical industry spends $107 billion a year on R&D, so BARDA accounts for roughly half of this spending. This gives me a very big pause. What was claimed to be these niched, small but important products such as biological and radiological defense projects that are otherwise not profitable – companies would not invest in them – so the government needs to help them out here… well, it turns out that they control the entire pharmaceutical industry. Because if you have one buyer that spends 50 percent of the R&D spend… they control the entire industry,” Latypova observes.
“My conclusion here is that in the United States, we don’t have a private pharmaceutical manufacturing industry anymore. We have a government-controlled pharmaceutical industry, specifically a government-defense pharmaceutical industry that funnels tremendous amounts of money… and this half avoids all the regulation,” she concludes.
In 2021, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel accused BARDA of serious financial misconduct and failure to report financial wrongdoing to Congress.
MCCULLOUGH: “U.S. MILITARY OPERATION”
Dr. Peter McCullough, a long-time critic of the mRNA injections, confirms many of Latypova’s claims about government and military involvement – including the timeline going back a decade.
“Moderna got its first money from DARPA and BARDA in 2013. This is a U.S. government program. The vaccine companies are just marketing shields. The vaccines, by the way, are made by biodefense contractors. Moderna is made by Resilience, a biodefense contractor, and then Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca are made by Emergent Biosolutions outside of Baltimore. This is a U.S. military operation… and Americans are being hurt,” McCullough said in a recent interview.
Peter McCullough estimates that at least 450,000 Americans have died from the mRNA injections.
In Sasha Latypova’s view, the COVID-19 measures taken by governments and corporations form clear evidence of a vast transnational criminal conspiracy – perpetrated under the color of law – that must be investigated and prosecuted.
“The shots as well as other ‘countermeasures’ like lockdowns, suppression of effective early treatments, overuse of opioids behind the closed doors of hospitals and nursing homes, overuse of ineffective and harmful (but very profitable) remdesivir, finishing patients off on a ventilator, or simply starving them to death locked in the hospital ‘covid unit’ are all nonsensical in the context of public health and are toxic by design,” Sasha Latypova writes on her blog.
“TOTALITARIANISM, TRANSHUMANISM AND DEPOPULATION”
Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Vice President and Chief Scientist of Pfizer’s Allergy and Respiratory Division, was one of the first Big Pharma insiders who warned about the COVID-19 injections and the sinister agenda behind the pandemic. For this, he was relentlessly attacked by biased “fact-checkers” and smear campaigns in mainstream media.
“Many of the players that you see, including Bill Gates, belong to families that have had a great interest in reducing the human population. This goes back centuries in some cases. It’s a multi-generational thing. These people have worked with others who share a vision of taking the world in this direction – towards totalitarianism, transhumanism and depopulation,” Dr. Yeadon says, explaining that government institutions, international organizations, corporations and media have been infiltrated and captured by operatives who are using COVID-19 as cover for committing genocide.
Latypova has arrived at a similar conclusion: that global governments are waging war on their own populations.
“They use taxpayers’ money to fund, develop, then ‘approve,’ purchase and deploy prohibited biowarfare agents for killing and injuring their own civilian population, their own armed forces, first responders, healthcare workers, pregnant women and children.”